We have audited the accompanying Standalone FinancialStatements of PVP Ventures Limited (hereinafter referred to as"the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31March 2025, and the Statement of Profit and Loss (includingOther Comprehensive Income), the Statement of Cash Flowsand the Statement of Changes in Equity, for the year thenended, and a summary of the material accounting policies andother explanatory information (hereinafter referred to as "theStandalone Financial Statements").
In our opinion and to the best of our information and accordingto the explanations given to us, the aforesaid StandaloneFinancial Statements give the information required by theCompanies Act, 2013 ("the Act") in the manner so requiredand give a true and fair view in conformity with the IndianAccounting Standards ("Ind AS") prescribed under Section133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian AccountingStandard) Rules, 2015, as amended, ("the Rules") and otheraccounting principles generally accepted in India, of the stateof affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2025, and its loss,total comprehensive loss, its cash flows and changes in equityfor the year ended on that date.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit of the Standalone Financial Statementsin accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specifiedunder Section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under thoseStandards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilityfor the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section ofour report. We are independent of the Company in accordancewith the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of CharteredAccountants of India ("ICAI") together with the ethicalrequirements that are relevant to our audit of the StandaloneFinancial Statements under the provisions of the Act and theRules made thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethicalresponsibilities in accordance with these requirements andthe ICAI's Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidenceobtained by us is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis forour audit opinion on the Standalone Financial Statements.
a) We draw attention to Note No. 61 of the StandaloneFinancial Statements which highlights that, CorporationFinance Investigation Department ("Investigationdepartment") of Securities and Exchange Board of India("SEBI") has issued summons under Section 11C of SEBI
Act, 1992, to the Company, Chief Executive Officer andthe Managing Director for production of documentsbefore the Investigating Authority. The summons wereissued relating to loans and investments extended tothe erstwhile subsidiaries (currently related party) - PVPGlobal Ventures Private Limited and PVP Media VenturesPrivate Limited and Wholly owned subsidiary - SafetrunkServices Private Limited. As stated in the said note, theManagement has duly responded to the said summonsand is confident of a favourable outcome.
Our opinion is not qualified in respect of above matter.
b) We draw attention to Note No. 51 & Note No. 52 ofthe Standalone Financial Statements, w.r.t interestfree secured loan provided to New Cyberabad CityProjects Private Limited (NCCPL) erstwhile subsidiaryand currently a related party of the Company and thecorresponding accounting. Principal amount of Rs.21,843.49 Lakhs is outstanding from the said party asat 31 March 2025. The Management of the Companyis confident of recovering the loan within the extendedtenor duly factoring in the future business plans of therelated party and considering positive developmentsw.r.t ongoing litigations as highlighted in the said note.Further the Company is guaranteed 50% payout from therevenues generated in excess of the loan outstanding,out of the sale/development of the aforesaid propertiesas per the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) as indicatedin the aforesaid note. Accordingly, the Management ofthe Company believes that neither is there a necessity tocharge interest on the loans advanced nor a requirementto create an allowance for expected credit loss
Based on the internal assessment/ professional opinionreceived, the Company believes that the provisionsof Section 186 of the Act in respect of loans, makinginvestments, providing guarantees and the securitiesare not applicable to the Company as it involved on thebusiness of providing infrastructural facilities, except forSection 186(1) of the Act.
c) We draw attention to Note No. 48 of the StandaloneFinancial Statements, which is related to the sale ofCompany's erstwhile subsidiary, i.e NCCPL to PicturehouseMedia Limited ("PHML"), related party of the Company, foran amount of Rs. 3,256.44 Lakhs out of which an amountof Rs. 2,800 Lakhs remains outstanding from PHML as at 31March 2025. As stated in the said note, the Managementis confident of receiving the amount within the stipulated/
agreed period and there is no necessity to create anallowance for expected credit loss despite PHML havingnegative Net worth, continuing losses and no significantbusiness activity being carried out by the said related party,considering the business plans of its subsidiary, NCCPL andconsidering positive developments w.r.t ongoing litigationsas highlighted in (b) above.
d) We draw attention to Note No. 40 of the StandaloneFinancial Statements, w.r.t appeals which have beenfiled w.r.t various Income Tax (IT), Goods and Service Tax(GST), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) andStamp Duty matters are pending adjudication with theappellate authorities. The Company has been advised thatit has a good case to support its stand and no provision isrequired to be created in this regard.
e) We draw attention to Note No. 46 of the StandaloneFinancial Statements, regarding managementassessment w.r.t applicability of the provisions of Section135 of the Act and rules thereon towards Corporate SocialResponsibility (CSR) expenditure for the year ended 31March 2024. The Company is in the process of quantifyingits liability considering legal interpretations around thecomputation of profits under Section 198 of the Act onthe basis of which the CSR spend is computed. While theCompany has created a provision during the current yearended 31 March 2025, based on the estimated maximumamount to be spent, the actual spend could vary basedon legal/ professional discussions being carried out inthis regard. Any adjustment to such an amount wouldbe carried out upon finalization of the assessment inthis regard and when such amount is finally remitted.Further the Management is of the view that, penaltywhich might arise on account of non-compliance, if any,shall be dealt with as and when it arises and the same isquantified/ levied by the respective regulatory authority.
The Management believes such non-compliance shall nothave a material impact on the Financial Statements for theyear ended 31 March 2025.
f) We draw attention to Note no. 50 of the StandaloneFinancial statements, which is w.r.t acquisition of HumainHealth Tech Private Limited ("HHT") from PV PotluriVentures Private Limited, related party of the Company foran amount of Rs. 2,249.60 Lakhs. Further, the Company hasprovided a loan amounting to Rs. 2,215.03 Lakhs to supportthe operations of the subsidiary/ repayment of existingdebt towards PV Potluri Ventures Private Limited (erstwhileHolding Company of HHT) and other related parties whichhas been classified as Deemed Investments aggregating toa total investment amount of Rs. 4,464.63 Lakhs. As statedin the said note considering the future business projectionsand estimated cash flows of the subsidiary, the Companycarried out impairment testing for the investment in HHTas required by Ind AS 36 - Impairment of Assets. Basedon the report from an independent registered valuer, it wasdetermined that the recoverable amount is less than thecarrying value as on the reporting date. The Managementhas created a provision for impairment of Rs. 669.69 Lakhswhich has been classified and presented as an exceptionalloss in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Key Audit Matters are those matters that, in our professionaljudgment, were of most significance in our audit of theStandalone Financial Statements of the current period.These matters were addressed in the context of our auditof the Standalone Financial Statements as a whole, andin forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide aseparate opinion on these matters. We have determined thematters described below to be the key audit matters to becommunicated in our Report.
Key Audit Matter
Auditor's Response
Revenue Recognition under Joint Development Agreements(JDAs)
The Company being land owner, has entered into JointDevelopment Agreements (JDAs) on 23 March 2022 withRainbow Foundations Limited ("Rainbow" or "Developer") tocomplete 6 towers wherein the Company shall provide the landand the Developer shall develop the incomplete towers.
The Company shall receive 40% of revenue received on sale offlats in Project Chetna and 36% from Project Ekanta.
During FY 2024-25, the Company has recognized revenuefor first time amounting to Rs. 190.24 lakhs from the JDA withRainbow by applying Ind AS 115 for recognition of revenue fromreal estate projects.
Principal audit procedures performed included the following:
• Read the Company's accounting policies relating to revenuerecognition under JDAs and evaluated their compliancewith Ind AS 115.
• Read the JDA with Rainbow , including:
• Reading and understanding key contract terms,project milestones;
• Revenue arrangement between the landowner and Developer
• Performance obligation of the developer andthe land owner.
• Refundable security deposit amount provided by thedeveloper and the mode in which the security depositshall be adjusted / refunded back to the developer.
The revenue from real estate projects in JDA is recognized at a
•
Read the executed sale deed evidencing the transfer of
point in time by the Company upon satisfying its performance
UDS or the property to the customer.
obligation as stated in the JDA i.e, upon transfer of Undivided
Obtained an understanding of the process, evaluated
share of land (UDS) to the customer which is - upon execution
the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the
of sale deed or handover of possession of the residential unit tothe customer whichever is earlier.
controls over revenue recognition.
Reviewed the revenue MIS shared by the developer to land
Given the significant level of judgement involved and the
owner for the details of the flat sold, gross receipt from the
quantitative significance, we have determined this to be a keyaudit matter.
customer, land owner share etc.
Evaluated the appropriateness and adequacy of relateddisclosures in the Standalone Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition against sale of development rights by
the Company
Read the Company's accounting policies relating to revenue
The Company has entered into a JDA with Casagrand Builder
recognition and evaluated their compliance with Ind AS 115.
Private Limited ("Casagrand" or "Developer") on 27 June 2022
Read the JDA and supplementary JDA with
for development of additional 12 acres of land under an area¬sharing model with 40% of the revenue share belonging to the
Casagrand , including:
Company.
In accordance with terms of the JDA Agreement, Developer had
paid Rs. 3,000 Lakhs as an Interest Free Refundable Security
• Revenue arrangement between the land
Deposit ("IFSD"). As part of settling the IFSD, the Company
owner and Developer
had agreed for foregoing 6,900 sq.ft of land area from its 40%
• Performance obligation of the developer and
area-share for an amount of Rs. 1,500 Lakhs and the balance Rs.
the land owner.
1,500 Lakhs the same shall be adjusted with the future revenues/cashflows.
• Refundable security deposit amount provided by the
developer and the mode in which the security deposit
Further, as per the supplemental agreement entered between
shall be adjusted / refunded back to the developer.
Casagrand and the Company on 14 March 2025, Casagrand has
Assessed the appropriateness of the Company's
adjusted Rs. 1,500 Lakhs towards the additional share of 6,900 Sq.ft.
accounting treatment of Rs. 1,500 lakhs recognised as
This amount of Security deposit adjusted is recognised as
revenue from Casagrand against 6,900 sq. ft. of land, in the
revenue during the FY 2023-24 in accordance with Ind AS 115
absence of formal registration i.e, sale deed, based on loss
• the performance obligation has been satisfied as the
of future economic benefit and contractual terms in the
Company contractually gave up all rights and future
supplementary agreement.
economic benefits associated with that portion of land i.e,
Evaluated the appropriateness and adequacy of related
6,900 sq ft, and Casagrand has obtained the correspondingbenefit and control.
• Further, Casagrand is now entitled to utilize and commerciallyexploit the additional land area, and the Company had nofurther enforceable rights, obligations, or liability to refundthe adjusted amount.
Given the significant level of judgement involved and thequantitative significance, we have determined this to be a keyaudit matter.
disclosures in the Standalone Financial Statements.
Assessment of impairment of investments in Subsidiaries
The Company has entered into a Share Purchase Agreement
Read and evaluated the accounting policies with respect to
("SPA") dated 06 October 2023 with PV Potluri Ventures PrivateLimited and Humain Healthtech Private Limited ("HHT") for
impairment of the investments.
purchase of 100% of shares of HHT from PV Potluri Ventures
Examined the management assessment in determining
Private Limited, a related party for consideration which shall bedischarged partly in cash and partly in shares of the Company.
whether any impairment indicators exist.
The consideration payable was as follows:
• Obtained Impairment Report provided by an independentregistered valuer for determining the impairment valueof the business of HHT and the valuer's assessmentassociated with the determination of impairment value andperformed the following procedures:
_ . . AmountParticulars
(In Rs. Lakhs)
Total Valuation (A) 4,004.58
• Assessed the reasonableness of the valuation
Less: Debt outstanding towards related 1,754.98party - PV Potluri Ventures PrivateLimited (B)
techniques and methodology considered by externalvaluer who has been appointed by the Management.
Total Consideration payable for 2,249.60Acquisition of HHT (C)=(A)-(B)
(Investment)
• Evaluated appropriateness of key assumptions providedby the management relating to forecasts of futureRevenues, operating margins, and discount rates etcused in the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation withreference to our understanding of their business andhistorical trends; and comparing past projections withactual results, including discussions with managementrelating to these projections.
• Compared the recoverable amount of the investment tothe carrying value in books.
• Evaluated the appropriateness and adequacy of relateddisclosures in the Standalone Financial Statements.
During the FY 2023-24 post acquisition the operations of HHTcontinued to face challenges such as significant reduction ofactual sales and profit after tax, suspension of operations at oneof its centers, attrition of employees etc.
However, being the first year of acquisition and based on futurebusiness projections, estimated cash flows from HHT, synergybenefit and support intended to be provided by the Company,no provision had been created for impairment of investment inHHT for the year ended 31 March 2024.
During the FY 2024-25, the operations of HHT continued to faceaforesaid challenges and based on identification of indicators ofimpairment, the Company has performed annual assessmentof investment by obtaining a impairment analysis report from aindependent registered valuer. Based on internal and externalfactors considered as stated above, an impairment loss of Rs.669.69 lakhs has been determined and recognized as a provisionfor impairment of Investment in the standalone financial statements.
The Company's evaluation of impairment of the investment involvescomparison of their recoverable value to their correspondingcarrying values. The Company used the discounted cash flowmodel to estimate recoverable values, which requires managementto make estimates and assumptions related to forecasts of futurerevenues, operating margins, and discount rates.
Given the significant level of judgement involved and thequantitative significance, we have determined this to be akey audit matter.
Contingent Liability
Over the years, the Company has received various demandsand Show Cause Notices (SCN) w.r.t Income Tax (IT), Goods andService Tax (GST), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)and Stamp Duty matter. The amount of such contingent liabilitiesdisclosed in Note 40.1 of the Standalone Financial statements isRs. 6,299.44 Lakhs.
The Company has filed replies against the SCN and in cases wherepost the SCN, demand order has been served on the Company -Appeals have been filed which are pending adjudication with theappellate authorities. In certain cases, where the Company hasreceived favourable order from the first level appellate authority,the respective regulatory authority could have filed an appealwith the subsequent appellate authority.
• Obtained an understanding of the management's process for:
• identification of legal and tax matters initiatedagainst the Company;
• assessment of accounting treatment for eachsuch litigation identified under Ind AS 37, and formeasurement of amounts involved.
Based on professional advice, the Company believes that it has a
Obtained an understanding of the nature of litigations
good case to support its stand and no provision is required to be
pending against the Company and discussed the key
created in any of the matters. For matters where the Company
developments during the year w.r.t litigations with
believes it does not stand a good chance, it has created provision
the management.
for contingency.
Obtained necessary SCN, reply filed, Demand order ,
The assessment of a provision or a contingent liability requires
appeals/ petitions filed at appellate/ judicial forum and
significant judgement by the management of the Company
reviewed the gist/ summary all the documents.
because of the inherent complexity in estimating the outcome.
We have also carried out the discussions with counsels/
The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the
independent consultant appointed by the Company to
expenditure. The provisions and contingent liabilities are subject
assist in defending disputes/ litigations assess the possible
to changes in the outcomes of litigations and claims and the
outcome relating to disputes. We have also evaluated their
positions taken by the management of the Company.
independence, objectivity and competence. Additionally,
The Company has revisited its process of quantification of
involved the auditors independent tax expert to understand
contingent liability on a wholistic basis by assessing various
the current status of the Income Tax cases and review
accounting principles/ industry practices/ legal interpretations/
the management's assessment of the possible outcome
judicial pronouncements and guidance provided by
of the disputes.
professional bodies.
Monitored developments on existing litigations and newlitigations, to ensure that the tax provisions/ contingentliability have been appropriately adjusted to reflect thelatest external developments and their potential materialimpact on the amounts recorded or disclosed in thefinancial statements.
• The Company's Board of Directors is responsible forthe other information. The other information comprisesthe information included in the Board's Report includingAnnexures thereto, Management Discussion and Analysis,Report on Corporate Governance and Chairman'sStatement but does not include the Standalone FinancialStatements and our auditor's report thereon.
• Our opinion on the Standalone Financial Statements doesnot cover the other information and we do not expressany form of assurance conclusion thereon.
• In connection with our audit of the Standalone FinancialStatements, our responsibility is to read the otherinformation and, in doing so, consider whether the otherinformation is materially inconsistent with the StandaloneFinancial Statements, or our knowledge obtained duringthe course of our audit or otherwise appears to bematerially misstated.
• If, based on the work we have performed on the otherinformation that we obtained prior to the date of thisauditor's report, we conclude that there is a materialmisstatement of this other information, we are required toreport that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for thematters stated in Section 134(5) of the Act with respect tothe preparation of these Standalone Financial Statementsthat give a true and fair view of the financial position, financialperformance including other comprehensive income, cashflows and changes in equity of the Company in accordancewith the Ind AS and accounting principles generally acceptedin India under Section 133 of the Act read with relevantrules issued thereunder. This responsibility also includesmaintenance of adequate accounting records in accordancewith the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assetsof the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds andother irregularities; the selection and application of appropriateaccounting policies; making judgments and the estimates thatare reasonable and prudent; and the design, implementationand maintenance of adequate internal financial controls,that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracyand completeness of the accounting records, relevant to thepreparation and presentation of the Standalone FinancialStatements that give a true and fair view and are free frommaterial misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Standalone Financial Statements, Managementand Board of Directors are responsible for assessing theCompany's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and usingthe going concern basis of accounting unless the Board ofDirectors either intends to liquidate the Company or to ceaseoperations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing theCompany's financial reporting process.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance aboutwhether the Standalone Financial Statements as a wholeare free from material misstatement, whether due to fraudor error, and to issue an Auditor's report that includes ouropinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance,but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordancewith SAs will always detect a material misstatement when itexists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and areconsidered material if, individually or in the aggregate, theycould reasonably be expected to influence the economicdecisions of users taken on the basis of these StandaloneFinancial Statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exerciseprofessional judgment and maintain professional skepticismthroughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatementof the Standalone Financial Statements, whether dueto fraud or error, design and perform audit proceduresresponsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence thatis sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for ouropinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatementresulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting fromerror, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentionalomissions, misrepresentations, or the override ofinternal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal financial controlrelevant to the audit in order to design audit proceduresthat are appropriate in the circumstances. Under Section143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressingour opinion on whether the Company has adequateinternal financial controls with reference to StandaloneFinancial Statements in place and the operatingeffectiveness of such controls.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies usedand the reasonableness of accounting estimates andrelated disclosures made by Management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of Management's useof the going concern basis of accounting and, basedon the audit evidence obtained, whether a materialuncertainty exists related to events or conditions thatmay cast significant doubt on the Company's ability tocontinue as a going concern. If we conclude that a materialuncertainty exists, we are required to draw attentionin our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the
Standalone Financial Statements or, if such disclosuresare inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusionsare based on the audit evidence obtained up to thedate of our auditor's report. However, future events orconditions may cause the Company to cease to continueas a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and contentof the Standalone Financial Statements, including thedisclosures, and whether the Standalone FinancialStatements represent the underlying transactions andevents in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
• Obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence regardingthe financial information of the entity to express an opinionon the Standalone Financial Statements.
Materiality is the magnitude of misstatements in the StandaloneFinancial Statements that, individually or in aggregate, makesit probable that the economic decisions of a reasonablyknowledgeable user of the Standalone Financial Statementsmay be influenced. We consider quantitative materiality andqualitative factors in (i) planning the scope of our audit workand in evaluating the results of our work; and (ii) to evaluatethe effect of any identified misstatements in the StandaloneFinancial Statements.
We communicate with those charged with governanceregarding, among other matters, the planned scope andtiming of the audit and significant audit findings, includingany significant deficiencies in internal control that we identifyduring our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with astatement that we have complied with relevant ethicalrequirements regarding independence, and to communicatewith them all relationships and other matters that mayreasonably be thought to bear on our independence, andwhere applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged withgovernance, we determine those matters that were of mostsignificance in the audit of the Standalone Financial Statementsof the current period and are therefore the key audit matters.We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless lawor regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter orwhen, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that amatter should not be communicated in our report becausethe adverse consequences of doing so would reasonablybe expected to outweigh the public interest benefits ofsuch communication.
1. As required by 'the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order2020 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government ofIndia in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the"Annexure A" statement on the matters specified in theparagraph 3 and 4 of the order.
2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, based on our
audit we report, to the extent applicable that:
a) We have sought, obtained all the information andexplanations which to the best of our knowledge andbelief were necessary for the purpose of our audit.
b) In our opinion proper books of account as required bylaw relating to preparation of the aforesaid StandaloneFinancial Statements have been kept by the Companyso far as appears from our examination of those booksexcept for not complying with the requirement ofmaintenance of audit trail as stated in 2(i)(vi) below.
c) The Standalone Balance Sheet, the StandaloneStatement of Profit and Loss including OtherComprehensive Income, the Standalone Statementof Cash Flows and the Standalone Statement ofChanges in Equity dealt with by this Report are inagreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion, aforesaid Standalone FinancialStatements comply with the Ind AS specified underSection 133 of the Act.
e) On the basis of written representations receivedfrom the directors as on 31 March 2025, taken onrecord by the Board of Directors, except for thefollowing, none of the directors are disqualified as on31 March 2025 from being appointed as a director interms of Section 164(2) of the Act.
SI.
No
Name of the Director
Category ofDirectorship
1.
Prasad V. Potluri
Managing Director
2.
P J Bhavani
Non-ExecutiveWoman Director
3.
Subramanian
Independent
Parameswaran
Director
Also refer Note 57(n) of the StandaloneFinancial Statements.
f) The modification relating to the maintenance ofaccounts and other matters connected therewithare as stated in point (b) section above.
g) With respect to the adequacy of the Internal FinancialControl over Financial Reporting of the Company andoperating effectiveness of such controls, refer to ourseparate report in "Annexure B". Our report expressesa Qualified opinion on the adequacy and operatingeffectiveness of the Company's internal financial controlsover financial reporting for the reasons stated therein.
h) With respect to the other matters to be includedin the Auditor's Report in accordance with therequirements of section 197(16) of the Act, asamended, in our opinion and to the best of ourinformation and according to the explanations given
to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to itsdirectors during the year is in accordance with theprovisions of Section 197 of the Act.
The Company has proposed to pay remunerationof Rs. 500 Lakhs to Mr. Prasad V. Potluri, ManagingDirector, for the FY 2024-25. In accordance withthe provisions of Sections 197 and 198 of the Act,the Company has incurred a loss for the said year;accordingly, the remuneration is determined basedon the Effective Capital as prescribed under ScheduleV to the Act. The proposed remuneration is subjectto approval of the shareholders by way of a specialresolution in the upcoming Annual General Meetingto be held in FY 2025-26. As at 31 March 2025, theCompany has accrued the remuneration expensein the books of account. However, no payment hasbeen made to the Managing Director. Refer Note 53to the Standalone Financial Statements.
i) With respect to the other matters to be includedin Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 ofthe Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, inour opinion and to the best of our information andaccording to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact ofpending litigations as at 31 March 2025 on itsfinancial position in its Standalone FinancialStatements (Refer Note 40 to the StandaloneFinancial Statements);
ii. The Company did not have any materialforeseeable losses on long-term contractsincluding derivative contracts;
iii. There are no amounts which were required tobe transferred to the Investor Education andProtection Fund by the Company.
iv. a) The Management has represented that,
to the best of its knowledge and belief,no funds have been advanced or loanedor invested (either from borrowed fundsor share premium or any other sourcesor kind of funds) by the Company to orin any other person or entity, includingforeign entity ("Intermediaries"), withthe understanding, whether recorded inwriting or otherwise, that the Intermediaryshall, whether, directly or indirectly lend orinvest in other persons or entities identifiedin any manner whatsoever by or on behalfof the Company ("Ultimate Beneficiaries")or provide any guarantee, security or thelike on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
b) The Management has represented, that,to the best of its knowledge and belief, nofunds have been received by the Companyfrom any person or entity, including
foreign entity ("Funding Parties"), withthe understanding, whether recorded inwriting or otherwise, that the Companyshall, whether, directly or indirectly, lendor invest in other persons or entitiesidentified in any manner whatsoever by oron behalf of the Funding Party ("UltimateBeneficiaries") or provide any guarantee,security or the like on behalf of theUltimate Beneficiaries;
c) Based on the audit procedures thathave been considered reasonable andappropriate in the circumstances, nothinghas come to our notice that has causedus to believe that the representationsprovided under sub-clause (i) and (ii) ofRule 11(e), as provided under (a) and (b)above, contain any material misstatement.
v. The Board has not declared any dividendduring the year. Hence, reporting on whetherthe same is in compliance with the provisionsof section 123 of the Act does not arise.
vi. Based on our examination, the Company usesTally Prime as its primary accounting software.However, the Company has not implementedthe Audit trail feature (Edit log facility) in theaccounting software. Hence, neither was theaudit trail feature of the said software enablednor was it operating during the year for allrelevant transactions recorded in the software.Accordingly, the requirement of examiningwhether there were any instances of the audittrail feature being tampered with and therequirement of preservation of the same by theCompany as per the statutory requirements forrecord retention, does not arise.
For PSDY & Associates
Chartered AccountantsFirm Registration Number: 010625S
Yashvant G
Partner
Date: 20 August 2025 Membership Number: 209865
Place: Chennai UDIN: 25209865BMIDBK4502